+66.5%
PBF vs NIO
-36.7%
+103.2%
-91.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -1.6% | +0.2% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +4.3% | -13.0% | +17.3% | +5.6% |
| 30D | +22.0% | -18.3% | +40.3% | +24.1% |
| 3M | +74.5% | -33.2% | +107.7% | +80.8% |
| 6M | +67.7% | -21.5% | +89.2% | +69.8% |
| YTD | +179.2% | -25.5% | +204.7% | +183.8% |
| 1Y | +170.0% | -38.0% | +208.0% | +178.4% |
| 3Y | +66.4% | -65.5% | +131.8% | +74.2% |
| 5Y | +764.5% | -90.6% | +855.1% | +882.3% |
| All | +66.5% | -36.7% | +103.2% | +41.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling