+37.2%
PATH vs UMC
+113.5%
-76.3%
-24.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.6% | +4.6% | -21.2% | -16.5% |
| 7D | -16.3% | +5.0% | -21.3% | -16.2% |
| 30D | +9.9% | +7.7% | +2.2% | +10.1% |
| 3M | +30.2% | +1.7% | +28.5% | +27.9% |
| 6M | +37.2% | +113.9% | -76.7% | +38.4% |
| All | +37.2% | +113.5% | -76.3% | +38.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling