+37.2%
PATH vs STZ
-17.1%
+54.3%
-24.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.6% | -0.7% | -15.9% | -16.7% |
| 7D | -16.3% | -1.9% | -14.4% | -16.5% |
| 30D | +9.9% | -1.9% | +11.8% | +9.7% |
| 3M | +30.2% | -6.2% | +36.4% | +29.2% |
| 6M | +37.2% | -14.0% | +51.2% | +31.0% |
| All | +37.2% | -17.1% | +54.3% | +31.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling