+37.2%
PATH vs RKT
-14.0%
+51.2%
-24.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | RKT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.6% | -1.1% | -15.5% | -16.4% |
| 7D | -16.3% | +2.1% | -18.4% | -16.6% |
| 30D | +9.9% | +1.4% | +8.5% | +9.7% |
| 3M | +30.2% | +6.3% | +23.9% | +30.1% |
| 6M | +37.2% | -15.5% | +52.7% | +36.1% |
| All | +37.2% | -14.0% | +51.2% | +36.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RKT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RKT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RKT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RKT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling