-14.2%
PATH vs NXT
+252.0%
-266.3%
-65.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | +11.1% | -8.2% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -4.8% | +30.0% | -34.8% | -8.6% |
| 30D | +2.7% | +28.6% | -25.9% | -1.4% |
| 3M | -4.2% | +8.4% | -12.6% | -5.8% |
| 6M | +24.7% | -8.7% | +33.5% | +23.5% |
| YTD | -17.6% | +22.5% | -40.1% | -25.4% |
| 1Y | -5.3% | +6.9% | -12.2% | -12.1% |
| 3Y | -22.0% | +186.9% | -208.9% | -44.8% |
| All | -14.2% | +252.0% | -266.3% | -45.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling