+37.2%
PATH vs FITB
+12.3%
+25.0%
-24.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.6% | -0.2% | -16.4% | -16.7% |
| 7D | -16.3% | +0.6% | -16.9% | -16.2% |
| 30D | +9.9% | -4.7% | +14.7% | +8.8% |
| 3M | +30.2% | +6.7% | +23.5% | +34.2% |
| 6M | +37.2% | +12.6% | +24.7% | +44.0% |
| All | +37.2% | +12.3% | +25.0% | +44.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling