+66.7%
PANW vs NIO
-36.7%
+103.4%
-36.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | +3.1% | -5.4% | -2.7% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -2.9% | +2.1% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -14.6% | -18.7% | +4.2% | -12.3% |
| 3M | +18.3% | -29.4% | +47.7% | +23.2% |
| 6M | +100.5% | -32.5% | +133.0% | +108.8% |
| YTD | +79.5% | -27.6% | +107.2% | +87.1% |
| 1Y | +66.7% | -39.2% | +105.9% | +82.6% |
| All | +66.7% | -36.7% | +103.4% | +82.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling