+62.2%
PANW vs NIO
-54.1%
+116.3%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +3.4% | -4.1% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -11.8% | -0.6% | -11.2% | -11.7% |
| 30D | -14.4% | -3.5% | -10.9% | -14.0% |
| 3M | -5.0% | -30.7% | +25.7% | -0.9% |
| 6M | +88.6% | -45.6% | +134.2% | +99.9% |
| YTD | +88.9% | -35.3% | +124.2% | +102.2% |
| 1Y | +62.2% | -53.9% | +116.2% | +87.2% |
| All | +62.2% | -54.1% | +116.3% | +87.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling