+573.7%
OUST vs NIO
-62.1%
+635.9%
-64.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.0% | -3.0% | -6.0% | -8.0% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -3.6% | -1.4% | -3.6% |
| 30D | -32.0% | -8.0% | -24.0% | -29.9% |
| 3M | -32.4% | -31.2% | -1.2% | -23.8% |
| 6M | +6.7% | -45.8% | +52.5% | +30.5% |
| YTD | +41.0% | -37.3% | +78.3% | +63.7% |
| 1Y | +18.0% | -56.1% | +74.1% | +50.5% |
| All | +573.7% | -62.1% | +635.9% | +814.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling