+4.9%
ORCL vs FTNT
+92.9%
-87.9%
-53.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FTNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +3.1% |
| 7D | +5.3% | -5.8% | +11.1% | +7.9% |
| 30D | +10.0% | -4.8% | +14.7% | +12.0% |
| 3M | -32.6% | +4.4% | -37.0% | -34.3% |
| 6M | +4.9% | +88.8% | -83.8% | -22.1% |
| All | +4.9% | +92.9% | -87.9% | -22.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FTNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FTNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FTNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FTNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling