+32.1%
ORCL vs AZO
+11.4%
+20.8%
-64.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.4% | +0.8% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +10.9% | -0.8% | +11.7% | +10.9% |
| 30D | +7.0% | -5.1% | +12.1% | +7.0% |
| 3M | -21.2% | -7.2% | -14.0% | -21.1% |
| 6M | +7.4% | -20.7% | +28.1% | +8.2% |
| YTD | -16.3% | -14.2% | -2.1% | -15.9% |
| 1Y | -32.3% | -32.2% | -0.1% | -30.9% |
| All | +32.1% | +11.4% | +20.8% | +17.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling