-39.2%
OPEN vs LCID
-91.4%
+52.2%
-89.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.5% | -11.3% | +1.8% | -5.7% |
| 7D | -31.0% | +9.2% | -40.2% | -34.1% |
| 30D | -41.5% | -3.0% | -38.5% | -41.5% |
| 3M | -64.6% | -50.2% | -14.4% | -56.0% |
| 6M | -73.8% | -45.8% | -27.9% | -69.7% |
| YTD | -78.8% | -69.2% | -9.6% | -70.7% |
| 1Y | -86.8% | -80.4% | -6.4% | -78.5% |
| All | -39.2% | -91.4% | +52.2% | +36.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling