-86.8%
OPEN vs GLDM
-6.3%
-80.5%
-86.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.5% | -2.8% | -6.7% | -7.3% |
| 7D | -31.0% | -5.5% | -25.5% | -27.5% |
| 30D | -41.5% | -7.0% | -34.5% | -37.8% |
| 3M | -64.6% | -12.3% | -52.3% | -60.8% |
| 6M | -73.8% | -17.9% | -55.9% | -69.6% |
| YTD | -78.8% | -10.3% | -68.5% | -78.5% |
| 1Y | -86.8% | -7.8% | -79.1% | -88.2% |
| All | -86.8% | -6.3% | -80.5% | -88.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling