-86.1%
OPEN vs GLDM
-8.0%
-78.1%
-86.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | +0.1% | -3.8% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -15.0% | -4.6% | -10.4% | -11.6% |
| 30D | -40.2% | -5.5% | -34.7% | -37.2% |
| 3M | -67.4% | -10.9% | -56.5% | -64.2% |
| 6M | -74.0% | -17.3% | -56.7% | -70.1% |
| YTD | -79.6% | -10.2% | -69.4% | -78.8% |
| 1Y | -86.1% | -6.9% | -79.2% | -87.2% |
| All | -86.1% | -8.0% | -78.1% | -87.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling