-84.0%
OPEN vs EPAM
-81.9%
-2.1%
-97.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -2.4% | +3.0% | +1.8% |
| 7D | -4.3% | +2.0% | -6.2% | -5.2% |
| 30D | -16.2% | +6.5% | -22.7% | -19.2% |
| 3M | -36.4% | +19.9% | -56.3% | -43.1% |
| 6M | -35.5% | -16.9% | -18.5% | -30.6% |
| YTD | -46.0% | -42.9% | -3.1% | -31.4% |
| 1Y | -47.1% | -30.4% | -16.8% | -39.7% |
| 3Y | -19.0% | -54.7% | +35.7% | +9.3% |
| All | -84.0% | -81.9% | -2.1% | -66.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling