+44.7%
ONTO vs VIK
+228.1%
-183.5%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VIK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +0.3% | +5.9% | +6.0% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -3.0% | +2.0% | +1.1% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -20.7% | +17.8% | +13.3% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -4.6% | +2.2% | +1.3% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +14.0% | +14.2% | +16.5% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +20.2% | +49.6% | +47.2% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +36.0% | +126.9% | +106.7% |
| All | +44.7% | +228.1% | -183.5% | -30.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VIK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VIK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VIK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VIK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling