+99.7%
ONTO vs VFC
-28.0%
+127.8%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VFC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +2.4% | +3.8% | +5.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -1.6% | +0.6% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -11.6% | +8.7% | +0.5% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -18.1% | +15.6% | +2.6% |
| 6M | +28.2% | -27.4% | +55.6% | +39.2% |
| YTD | +69.8% | -24.8% | +94.6% | +81.6% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | -8.2% | +171.1% | +164.2% |
| All | +99.7% | -28.0% | +127.8% | +98.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VFC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VFC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VFC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VFC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling