-41.1%
ONTO vs UMAC
-13.6%
-27.4%
-58.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.1% | +10.8% | +0.3% | +8.6% |
| 7D | -14.0% | -23.4% | +9.3% | -8.8% |
| 30D | -43.1% | -45.6% | +2.5% | -35.7% |
| 3M | -35.5% | -50.9% | +15.4% | -27.4% |
| 6M | -41.1% | -16.5% | -24.5% | -36.9% |
| All | -41.1% | -13.6% | -27.4% | -36.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling