+99.7%
ONTO vs TXT
+1.6%
+98.1%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -0.4% | +6.5% | +6.4% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -4.8% | +3.8% | +2.5% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -10.6% | +7.7% | +5.3% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -13.2% | +10.7% | +7.9% |
| 6M | +28.2% | -20.3% | +48.6% | +50.3% |
| YTD | +69.8% | -9.3% | +79.0% | +79.6% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | -2.7% | +165.6% | +164.6% |
| All | +99.7% | +1.6% | +98.1% | +79.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling