+294.9%
ONTO vs TSLQ
-97.0%
+391.9%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TSLQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +12.0% | -5.8% | +9.0% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -5.8% | +4.8% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -22.1% | +19.2% | -7.9% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +10.1% | -12.5% | +5.7% |
| 6M | +28.2% | -6.8% | +35.0% | +37.3% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +8.5% | +61.2% | +89.9% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | -49.7% | +212.6% | +158.8% |
| 3Y | +95.9% | -95.6% | +191.6% | +55.9% |
| All | +294.9% | -97.0% | +391.9% | +209.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TSLQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TSLQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TSLQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TSLQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling