+171.3%
ONTO vs TRGP
+83.8%
+87.4%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.9% | +1.5% | +3.4% | +5.2% |
| 7D | +9.7% | -0.6% | +10.2% | +9.5% |
| 30D | -8.8% | +14.6% | -23.4% | -6.3% |
| 3M | +4.5% | +11.9% | -7.4% | +7.2% |
| 6M | +56.4% | +25.3% | +31.1% | +60.0% |
| YTD | +78.1% | +61.9% | +16.2% | +78.9% |
| 1Y | +171.3% | +87.3% | +84.0% | +171.8% |
| All | +171.3% | +83.8% | +87.4% | +171.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling