+171.3%
ONTO vs RSG
-2.3%
+173.6%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.9% | -0.5% | +5.4% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +9.7% | -0.7% | +10.4% | +8.6% |
| 30D | -8.8% | +3.3% | -12.1% | -4.2% |
| 3M | +4.5% | +8.5% | -4.0% | +17.4% |
| 6M | +56.4% | -3.5% | +59.9% | +62.7% |
| YTD | +78.1% | +5.5% | +72.6% | +99.0% |
| 1Y | +171.3% | -1.7% | +173.0% | +188.0% |
| All | +171.3% | -2.3% | +173.6% | +188.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling