+99.7%
ONTO vs RPRX
+128.5%
-28.8%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RPRX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +0.1% | +6.0% | +6.2% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +5.1% | -6.1% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -2.9% | +11.2% | -14.1% | -2.9% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +16.7% | -19.2% | -2.9% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +36.0% | -7.8% | +25.0% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +67.8% | +2.0% | +63.6% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +76.7% | +86.2% | +151.5% |
| All | +99.7% | +128.5% | -28.8% | +99.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RPRX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RPRX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RPRX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RPRX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling