+62.8%
ONTO vs PSKY
-40.3%
+103.1%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PSKY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | -4.8% | 0.0% | -4.4% |
| 7D | -25.1% | -24.6% | -0.5% | -23.0% |
| 30D | -11.8% | -36.1% | +24.4% | -8.3% |
| 3M | -22.5% | -37.1% | +14.6% | -19.5% |
| 6M | -17.4% | -40.5% | +23.1% | -13.9% |
| YTD | +39.8% | -47.7% | +87.5% | +46.7% |
| 1Y | +62.7% | -58.4% | +121.1% | +73.5% |
| All | +62.8% | -40.3% | +103.1% | +68.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PSKY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PSKY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PSKY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PSKY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling