+45.2%
ONTO vs PPG
+2.5%
+42.6%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PPG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.1% | -0.7% | +11.8% | +11.6% |
| 7D | -14.0% | +2.4% | -16.4% | -16.0% |
| 30D | -43.1% | +16.5% | -59.5% | -49.6% |
| 3M | -35.5% | +5.1% | -40.6% | -38.3% |
| 6M | -41.1% | +11.1% | -52.2% | -46.3% |
| YTD | +9.8% | +21.7% | -11.9% | -8.6% |
| 1Y | +31.5% | +32.0% | -0.4% | +2.1% |
| 3Y | +45.2% | +2.8% | +42.4% | +30.6% |
| All | +45.2% | +2.5% | +42.6% | +30.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PPG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PPG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PPG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PPG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling