+61.0%
ONTO vs PLTD
-77.8%
+138.8%
-60.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +4.6% | +1.5% | +7.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +5.9% | -7.0% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -11.6% | +8.7% | -5.9% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -29.9% | +27.5% | -9.4% |
| 6M | +28.2% | -28.5% | +56.7% | +21.1% |
| YTD | +69.8% | -20.4% | +90.2% | +69.7% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | -33.3% | +196.1% | +150.2% |
| All | +61.0% | -77.8% | +138.8% | +12.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling