+108.7%
ONTO vs NTR
+38.7%
+70.0%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -1.6% | +7.7% | +6.3% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +8.1% | -9.1% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -2.9% | +18.8% | -21.6% | -4.6% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +16.2% | -18.7% | -4.1% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +9.8% | +18.5% | +26.1% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +30.9% | +38.9% | +61.0% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +41.8% | +121.1% | +144.0% |
| All | +108.7% | +38.7% | +70.0% | +86.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling