+31.5%
ONTO vs NIO
-54.3%
+85.8%
-58.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.1% | +5.9% | +5.1% | +9.4% |
| 7D | -14.0% | +5.6% | -19.6% | -15.2% |
| 30D | -43.1% | -4.2% | -38.8% | -42.4% |
| 3M | -35.5% | -26.3% | -9.2% | -30.7% |
| 6M | -41.1% | -42.5% | +1.5% | -33.2% |
| YTD | +9.8% | -33.5% | +43.3% | +20.4% |
| 1Y | +31.5% | -52.7% | +84.2% | +43.4% |
| All | +31.5% | -54.3% | +85.8% | +43.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling