+108.7%
ONTO vs MTCH
-2.6%
+111.4%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTCH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -1.3% | +7.5% | +6.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +0.7% | -1.7% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -2.9% | +9.7% | -12.6% | -5.8% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +21.1% | -23.5% | -8.9% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +37.5% | -9.3% | +14.6% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +31.9% | +37.9% | +53.2% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +14.6% | +148.3% | +148.0% |
| All | +108.7% | -2.6% | +111.4% | +89.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTCH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTCH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTCH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTCH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling