-48.9%
ONTO vs LII
-32.0%
-16.9%
-58.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -15.6% | -2.8% | -12.8% | -14.6% |
| 7D | -29.7% | +0.2% | -29.9% | -29.7% |
| 30D | -50.3% | -4.6% | -45.7% | -49.8% |
| 3M | -43.5% | -21.7% | -21.8% | -35.6% |
| 6M | -48.9% | -32.8% | -16.1% | -37.5% |
| All | -48.9% | -32.0% | -16.9% | -37.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling