+45.2%
ONTO vs LCID
-93.0%
+138.2%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.1% | +10.4% | +0.7% | +9.5% |
| 7D | -14.0% | +8.9% | -23.0% | -15.1% |
| 30D | -43.1% | -15.4% | -27.7% | -41.7% |
| 3M | -35.5% | -52.9% | +17.4% | -28.3% |
| 6M | -41.1% | -46.8% | +5.8% | -37.1% |
| YTD | +9.8% | -68.9% | +78.6% | +26.5% |
| 1Y | +31.5% | -81.7% | +113.2% | +64.1% |
| 3Y | +45.2% | -92.4% | +137.5% | +101.7% |
| All | +45.2% | -93.0% | +138.2% | +101.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling