+99.7%
ONTO vs FROG
+198.7%
-98.9%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -3.3% | +9.5% | +6.9% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -11.3% | +10.3% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -2.9% | +3.6% | -6.5% | -3.8% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +1.7% | -4.1% | -3.4% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +123.5% | -95.3% | +5.8% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +40.2% | +29.5% | +52.9% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +81.0% | +81.9% | +120.8% |
| All | +99.7% | +198.7% | -98.9% | +43.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling