+121.1%
ONTO vs EQX
+178.7%
-57.5%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EQX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +1.7% | -2.6% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +9.4% | +1.7% | +7.6% | +8.9% |
| 30D | -4.4% | +11.1% | -15.5% | -6.7% |
| 3M | +1.6% | +23.1% | -21.5% | -3.1% |
| 6M | +45.3% | -21.8% | +67.1% | +48.2% |
| YTD | +76.4% | -8.1% | +84.5% | +75.1% |
| 1Y | +167.2% | +29.7% | +137.5% | +152.2% |
| All | +121.1% | +178.7% | -57.5% | +88.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EQX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EQX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EQX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EQX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling