+99.7%
ONTO vs EPAM
-54.6%
+154.3%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -2.4% | +8.5% | +6.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +2.0% | -3.0% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -2.9% | +6.5% | -9.4% | -4.3% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +19.9% | -22.4% | -6.3% |
| 6M | +28.2% | -16.9% | +45.1% | +35.9% |
| YTD | +69.8% | -42.9% | +112.7% | +100.7% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | -30.4% | +193.3% | +187.6% |
| All | +99.7% | -54.6% | +154.3% | +138.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling