+54.8%
ONTO vs EPAM
-42.9%
+97.7%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.7% | -0.6% | -8.1% | -8.6% |
| 7D | -17.4% | +0.8% | -18.2% | -17.5% |
| 30D | -43.2% | +24.9% | -68.1% | -44.9% |
| 3M | -35.7% | +22.6% | -58.3% | -38.0% |
| 6M | -38.3% | +24.2% | -62.5% | -40.3% |
| YTD | +17.1% | -33.0% | +50.0% | +35.0% |
| 1Y | +43.1% | -13.3% | +56.5% | +50.1% |
| All | +54.8% | -42.9% | +97.7% | +85.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling