+123.4%
ONTO vs CRBG
+122.1%
+1.3%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CRBG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | +1.4% | +3.2% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +4.9% | +0.6% | +4.4% | +4.5% |
| 30D | -16.6% | +2.6% | -19.3% | -18.2% |
| 3M | -7.3% | +24.0% | -31.3% | -20.3% |
| 6M | +45.9% | +50.5% | -4.6% | +10.0% |
| YTD | +78.2% | +17.1% | +61.0% | +56.7% |
| 1Y | +159.8% | +5.9% | +153.9% | +143.6% |
| 3Y | +123.4% | +122.7% | +0.7% | +44.6% |
| All | +123.4% | +122.1% | +1.3% | +44.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CRBG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CRBG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CRBG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CRBG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling