+99.7%
ONTO vs CLBK
+51.7%
+48.1%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | 0.0% | +6.2% | +6.2% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +1.2% | -2.2% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -2.9% | +9.1% | -12.0% | -5.7% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +27.7% | -30.1% | -10.7% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +40.8% | -12.6% | +13.3% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +66.4% | +3.4% | +40.6% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +72.4% | +90.5% | +114.5% |
| All | +99.7% | +51.7% | +48.1% | +68.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling