+30.7%
ONTO vs CG
+48.3%
-17.6%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -15.6% | -6.5% | -9.1% | -11.4% |
| 7D | -29.7% | -1.5% | -28.2% | -28.9% |
| 30D | -50.3% | +2.8% | -53.1% | -51.3% |
| 3M | -43.5% | -19.2% | -24.2% | -35.8% |
| 6M | -48.9% | -21.0% | -27.9% | -41.2% |
| YTD | -1.2% | -31.0% | +29.8% | +23.1% |
| 1Y | +14.9% | -21.1% | +36.0% | +29.8% |
| All | +30.7% | +48.3% | -17.6% | +20.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling