+99.7%
ONTO vs BLDR
-55.3%
+155.1%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +2.5% | +3.7% | +5.1% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -2.8% | +1.8% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -13.3% | +10.4% | +3.0% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -12.3% | +9.8% | +2.3% |
| 6M | +28.2% | -31.5% | +59.7% | +48.3% |
| YTD | +69.8% | -36.1% | +105.8% | +100.5% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | -54.1% | +217.0% | +255.1% |
| All | +99.7% | -55.3% | +155.1% | +150.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling