+43.1%
ONTO vs BLDR
-38.1%
+81.2%
-51.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.7% | +9.3% | -17.9% | -10.9% |
| 7D | -17.4% | +24.4% | -41.7% | -23.3% |
| 30D | -43.2% | +24.9% | -68.1% | -47.5% |
| 3M | -35.7% | -7.8% | -27.9% | -33.0% |
| 6M | -38.3% | -5.8% | -32.5% | -36.8% |
| YTD | +17.1% | -32.5% | +49.5% | +36.6% |
| 1Y | +43.1% | -36.7% | +79.8% | +69.9% |
| All | +43.1% | -38.1% | +81.2% | +69.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling