+97.7%
ONTO vs BIYA
-99.8%
+197.4%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -1.7% | +7.9% | +6.1% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +1.3% | -2.4% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -21.0% | +18.1% | -3.2% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -74.3% | +71.9% | -3.6% |
| 6M | +28.2% | -84.6% | +112.8% | +28.5% |
| YTD | +69.8% | -94.2% | +163.9% | +72.1% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | -98.2% | +261.1% | +172.5% |
| All | +97.7% | -99.8% | +197.4% | +103.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling