+58.4%
ONTO vs BHP
+58.3%
+0.1%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.9% | +1.2% | +7.7% | +7.9% |
| 7D | +16.4% | +2.4% | +14.0% | +14.7% |
| 30D | -21.4% | -5.4% | -16.1% | -17.0% |
| 3M | -32.7% | -6.9% | -25.9% | -28.3% |
| 6M | -25.2% | -4.3% | -20.9% | -21.6% |
| YTD | +36.2% | +41.6% | -5.4% | +4.3% |
| 1Y | +61.2% | +53.3% | +7.9% | +15.9% |
| All | +58.4% | +58.3% | +0.1% | +9.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling