+99.7%
ONTO vs BHP
+76.8%
+23.0%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -0.3% | +6.5% | +6.4% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -2.9% | +1.9% | +1.4% |
| 30D | -2.9% | +3.4% | -6.3% | -5.8% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +4.1% | -6.5% | -5.5% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +20.6% | +7.6% | +10.4% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +56.1% | +13.7% | +19.6% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +69.6% | +93.3% | +73.8% |
| All | +99.7% | +76.8% | +23.0% | +18.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling