+30.7%
ONTO vs ACGL
+35.5%
-4.8%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -15.6% | -0.1% | -15.5% | -15.6% |
| 7D | -29.7% | +6.4% | -36.1% | -28.1% |
| 30D | -50.3% | +16.6% | -66.9% | -47.6% |
| 3M | -43.5% | +11.6% | -55.1% | -41.0% |
| 6M | -48.9% | +17.5% | -66.3% | -46.1% |
| YTD | -1.2% | +15.3% | -16.5% | +4.1% |
| 1Y | +14.9% | +26.3% | -11.4% | +20.0% |
| All | +30.7% | +35.5% | -4.8% | +44.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling