+162.9%
ONTO vs ACGL
+4.8%
+158.1%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -1.7% | +7.9% | +4.1% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -0.7% | -0.3% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -1.0% | -1.9% | -3.4% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +11.0% | -13.5% | +8.9% |
| 6M | +28.2% | -0.3% | +28.5% | +34.1% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +2.3% | +67.5% | +83.0% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +6.4% | +156.5% | +187.7% |
| All | +162.9% | +4.8% | +158.1% | +187.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling