+54.8%
ONTO vs ABCL
+164.7%
-109.8%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.7% | +0.8% | -9.5% | -8.9% |
| 7D | -17.4% | -10.0% | -7.4% | -15.3% |
| 30D | -43.2% | -10.9% | -32.3% | -41.7% |
| 3M | -35.7% | +101.6% | -137.4% | -46.4% |
| 6M | -38.3% | +167.5% | -205.8% | -53.1% |
| YTD | +17.1% | +259.1% | -242.0% | -18.6% |
| 1Y | +43.1% | +152.2% | -109.0% | +7.4% |
| All | +54.8% | +164.7% | -109.8% | +2.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling