-22.1%
ONON vs ZM
-65.8%
+43.8%
-68.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -4.8% | +2.3% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -1.7% | +1.6% | -3.3% | -2.5% |
| 30D | -27.4% | -7.7% | -19.7% | -24.9% |
| 3M | -26.5% | -4.7% | -21.9% | -25.7% |
| 6M | -34.2% | +24.4% | -58.7% | -43.6% |
| YTD | -41.3% | +11.8% | -53.1% | -47.8% |
| 1Y | -39.7% | +13.4% | -53.0% | -47.1% |
| 3Y | -7.8% | +33.8% | -41.7% | -29.1% |
| All | -22.1% | -65.8% | +43.8% | +13.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling