-22.1%
ONON vs MTB
+108.1%
-130.2%
-68.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -0.6% | -2.0% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -1.7% | +2.8% | -4.4% | -3.1% |
| 30D | -27.4% | -4.2% | -23.2% | -25.7% |
| 3M | -26.5% | +7.8% | -34.3% | -29.6% |
| 6M | -34.2% | +14.8% | -49.0% | -39.2% |
| YTD | -41.3% | +20.8% | -62.1% | -47.3% |
| 1Y | -39.7% | +23.1% | -62.8% | -46.5% |
| 3Y | -7.8% | +114.8% | -122.7% | -41.0% |
| All | -22.1% | +108.1% | -130.2% | -44.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling