+24.5%
ONON vs HTZ
-81.9%
+106.4%
-57.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.7% | -6.1% | +1.4% | -4.3% |
| 7D | -11.9% | -14.0% | +2.1% | -11.1% |
| 30D | -6.8% | -19.8% | +13.0% | -5.7% |
| 3M | +6.6% | -45.0% | +51.6% | +9.9% |
| 6M | -2.2% | -73.2% | +71.0% | +5.1% |
| YTD | -28.9% | -70.0% | +41.2% | -24.8% |
| 1Y | -20.3% | -75.7% | +55.4% | -14.4% |
| All | +24.5% | -81.9% | +106.4% | +37.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling