-20.0%
ONON vs ARMK
+159.6%
-179.7%
-68.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -0.9% | -0.4% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -3.0% | -2.4% | -0.6% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -26.7% | 0.0% | -26.7% | -28.1% |
| 3M | -25.3% | +6.7% | -32.0% | -30.2% |
| 6M | -35.3% | +38.8% | -74.1% | -50.6% |
| YTD | -39.8% | +55.2% | -95.0% | -57.9% |
| 1Y | -39.2% | +46.6% | -85.8% | -55.8% |
| 3Y | -4.2% | +112.9% | -117.1% | -52.7% |
| All | -20.0% | +159.6% | -179.7% | -62.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling