+709.2%
ONDS vs ZETA
+274.1%
+435.1%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +0.5% | -1.0% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -6.5% | +1.5% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -25.6% | +4.8% | -30.4% | -27.1% |
| 3M | -22.1% | +53.3% | -75.5% | -33.3% |
| 6M | -27.6% | +66.8% | -94.4% | -39.7% |
| YTD | -25.7% | +50.2% | -75.9% | -36.5% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +62.0% | -31.6% | +8.3% |
| All | +709.2% | +274.1% | +435.1% | +220.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling