+695.1%
ONDS vs ZETA
+348.6%
+346.5%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | -1.7% | -1.3% | -2.5% |
| 7D | -3.3% | +18.1% | -21.4% | -8.3% |
| 30D | -16.0% | +13.6% | -29.5% | -19.0% |
| 3M | -42.1% | +23.7% | -65.8% | -45.9% |
| 6M | -41.8% | +128.5% | -170.3% | -55.1% |
| YTD | -47.1% | +80.1% | -127.2% | -56.7% |
| 1Y | -21.3% | +98.0% | -119.3% | -37.0% |
| 3Y | +695.1% | +348.6% | +346.5% | +347.5% |
| All | +695.1% | +348.6% | +346.5% | +347.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling