+713.6%
ONDS vs XLC
+70.4%
+643.2%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.3% | -0.6% | -3.7% | -3.3% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -1.4% | -2.8% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -21.7% | -0.9% | -20.8% | -21.1% |
| 3M | -24.5% | -0.3% | -24.1% | -25.6% |
| 6M | -25.0% | -5.2% | -19.8% | -18.5% |
| YTD | -25.3% | -5.3% | -20.0% | -19.8% |
| 1Y | +33.8% | -2.8% | +36.6% | +38.8% |
| All | +713.6% | +70.4% | +643.2% | +175.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling