+709.2%
ONDS vs TNA
+99.7%
+609.4%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -3.0% | +2.5% | +1.6% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -7.6% | +2.6% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -25.6% | -13.6% | -11.9% | -17.1% |
| 3M | -22.1% | +2.8% | -25.0% | -22.9% |
| 6M | -27.6% | +34.5% | -62.1% | -40.2% |
| YTD | -25.7% | +41.0% | -66.7% | -40.1% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +52.0% | -21.6% | +2.2% |
| All | +709.2% | +99.7% | +609.4% | +338.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling